REPORT. ISO/TR. First edition. Reference number . This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC. (International Standard Risk Management ISO Draft Review) ISO , the international standard for Risk Management – ‘Risk Management. Hi:bigwave: Does anybody have a copy of the draft working document ISO they could share with little me? ttfn Ben.

Author: Akinokora Kazragis
Country: Kazakhstan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 12 April 2005
Pages: 399
PDF File Size: 13.15 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.99 Mb
ISBN: 761-4-88070-401-5
Downloads: 60565
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kagrel

Care needed to be taken in in considering all the points raised and discussions on the right way forward took considerable time. Find out more About Us. The one remark I have is the note 1 on the definition of risk. Two of these, the disruption and supply chain risk standards, have failed to make the grade and have recently been officially dropped, but the legal risk standard ISO is now in development with the national standards bodies of China and the UK jointly leading the work.

The final DIS text has not dramatically changed the version and all steps in the process have been kept. Our main challenge was to find a fair and sensible balance between supplementing the chapter with necessary concepts and not losing sight of sraft other users. The content between brackets should be left out.

The intention throughout the revision process in recent meetings has been to focus on the fundamentals and in doing so create a shorter, clearer and more concise document that is easier to read and apply. Hosting services provided by: The process gives you the chance to suggest areas you would like to see adapted or removed and even add new elements that would benefit users in the front line.

Don’t be the weak link. It should be noted that there was some convergence, from initially very different positions, from members of the technical committee, and in some cases National Mirror Committees, towards a shared vision of best practice in global risk management.

This is a new section in the standard. The next steps will be a review of the comments submitted that will modify the text further and then a ballot by ISO members to move to the final publication. There was considerable discussion on fundamental issues on the role 3104 standards. Although effects can also become risk sources, the way note 1 izo phrased only leads to a short sighted view on what can be understood by sraft.


The next ISO meeting is being held in San Francisco in July and this suggests publication of the revised risk management standard perhaps early in The major task to accomplish is progress the revision of ISO The vision was to phrase a framework clause that provides guidance that is relevant for every possible user of the standard. The overall message of ISO stays the same that the risk management process is an integrated part of strategic and operational management.

Internet of Things What does it mean?

The next steps of the revision process are translation into French followed by comments and ballots from the National Standardization Bodies. Initially it was agreed that only minimal changes would be made to the standard while the committee looked at the potential for more eraft revision.

ISO Risk Management Standard Draft available for comment.

The message TC would like to pass on to the reader of the DIS is to critically assess if the current draft provides the required guidance while still remaining relevant to all organizations, in all countries. The definitions still mentioned in the standard … the following apply are kept to a strict minimum and mainly those that have updated notes:.

The revision for the ISO standard is to be finalized in The result was that it was agreed that there was a need to reduce the text quite a lot but that an appropriate balance between giving guidance with enough details and not turning the guidance offered into a school text book. This DIS is at an extremely important stage and we recommend that you review it very carefully in the context and wider activities of your organisation.

The problem I have with this sentence is the parts between brackets.

As this ddaft was followed by 29 definitions that fully defined risk management the ISO way. There was also support for more detailed and precise guidance though this ran the risk of adding to both the length and complexity of the standard. Climate adaptation measures and our BCM approach – a user perspective. It can be positive sometimes expressed as opportunitiesnegative sometimes expressed as threats or both.

This view was formed at the Moscow meeting and stuck to while resolving the comments on the technical committee draft reviewed in Jordan.

Articles Recognising threat – the importance of pre-incident surveillance. lso

It can be positive, negative or both. Cyber There’s a good time coming The most recent meeting in Jordan provided the impetus and key changes necessary to move the standard forward and out of its committee stages making it available for wider comment. In a series of articles we want to present and discuss the ido changes that are to be expected.


From the comments made by the contributing experts it was clear that Annex A should be removed and instead the topic dealt with separately through a 310004 Work item proposal to address risk management maturity. A common theme found in the comments was the addition of concepts or examples specific to countries or industries. Isk the same time period three other risk standards have been proposed by ISO covering disruption related risk, supply chain risk management and legal risk.

The changes in the revision only concern the notes to the definitions.

Revision of ISO 31000 Risk Management Guidelines – Draft available

The strengthened generic nature of the standard can hopefully provide for confidence between experts and end users who each have specific problems in risk but need to understand and communicate with others stakeholders.

It immediately shows what the intent of the revision is. Because in my opinion, opportunities and threats are external risk sources in the same way as weaknesses and strengths are internal risk sources.

In general the changes are in the direction of a better wording and more complete coverage of what the notes want to convey. The decision to review Daft was taken at in Chicago in and now, 4 years later, a draft version of drafr proposed updates to the ISO document is available for users to see.

The consequences are then the effects of uncertainty on the objectives isoo to the opportunity pursued. The draft of the standard for review and comment is now available on the BSI Draft Review system at https: Please do review and pass drafg your thoughts and opinions by clicking the box below.

In the committee commenting stages there was a strong desire to address the proliferation of terms, that could impair the ease of access to the standard or add to confusion across sectors for many users.